Current:Home > reviewsUber and Lyft drivers remain independent contractors in California Supreme Court ruling -ValueMetric
Uber and Lyft drivers remain independent contractors in California Supreme Court ruling
View
Date:2025-04-17 20:22:26
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that app-based ride-hailing and delivery services like Uber and Lyft can continue treating their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees.
The unanimous decision by the state’s top court is a big win for tech giants. It also ends a yearslong legal battle between labor unions and tech companies over a law dictating the status of app-based service workers in the state.
The ruling upholds a voter-approved law passed in 2020 that said drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft are independent contractors and are not entitled to benefits like overtime pay, paid sick leave and unemployment insurance. Opponents said the law was illegal in part because it limited the state Legislature’s authority to change the law or pass laws about workers’ compensation programs.
A lower court ruling in 2021 had said the measure was illegal, but an appeals court reversed that decision last year. The California Supreme Court’s decision means companies like Uber and Lyft can continue their operations as before.
Uber called the ruling “a victory” for drivers. Companies like Uber, Lyft and DoorDash spent $200 million on a campaign in 2020 to help the law pass.
“Whether drivers or couriers choose to earn just a few hours a week or more, their freedom to work when and how they want is now firmly etched into California law, putting an end to misguided attempts to force them into an employment model that they overwhelmingly do not want,” the company said in a statement Thursday.
The ruling is a defeat for labor unions and their allies in the Legislature who fought to secure more rights for drivers.
“What’s going on is not just. It’s not what California is about,” said Nicole Moore, president of Los Angeles-based Rideshare Drivers United. “It’s a sad day for workers.”
Labor unions vowed to continue fighting for drivers’ job protections and benefits, noting that an earlier ruling in the appeal process had opened doors for the Legislature to pass laws to allow drivers to join a union.
“We are committed to fiercely backing workers across our economy who have been written out and left behind and helping them knock down big obstacles to winning their union rights,” Service Employees International Union President April Verrett said in a statement.
Lawmakers in 2019 passed a law aimed directly at Uber and Lyft, mandating they provide drivers with protections like minimum wage, overtime, health insurance and reimbursement for expenses. It changed the rules in California of who is an employee and who is an independent contractor.
While the law applied to lots of industries, it had the biggest impact on app-based ride-hailing and delivery companies. Their business relies on contracting with people to use their own cars. Under the 2019 law, companies would have to treat those drivers as employees and provide certain benefits that would greatly increase the businesses’ expenses.
In November 2020, voters approved a ballot proposition to exempt app-based ride-hailing and delivery companies from the law. The proposition included “alternative benefits” for drivers, including a guaranteed minimum wage and subsidies for health insurance if they average at least 25 hours of work a week.
Labor groups and drivers across the nation are pushing for more job protections, higher wages and increased benefits. Drivers in Massachusetts are rallying behind what they describe as a first-of-its-kind ballot question that could win them union rights if approved.
veryGood! (79)
Related
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Clemen Langston: What Role Does the Option Seller Play?
- How red-hot Detroit Tigers landed in MLB playoff perch: 'No pressure, no fear'
- Gunman in Colorado supermarket shooting is the latest to fail with insanity defense
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Eric Stonestreet says 'Modern Family' Mitch and Cam spinoff being rejected was 'hurtful'
- Severe obesity is on the rise in the US
- Runaway cockatiel missing for days found in unlikely haven: A humane society CEO's backyard
- Organizers cancel Taylor Swift concerts in Vienna over fears of an attack
- Alleging Decades of Lies, California Sues ExxonMobil Over Plastic Pollution Crisis
Ranking
- Boy who wandered away from his 5th birthday party found dead in canal, police say
- Mack Brown apologizes for reaction after North Carolina's loss to James Madison
- GM, Ford, Daimler Truck, Kia among 653,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
- QTM Community: The Revolutionary Force in Future Investing
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Watch as 8 bulls escape from pen at Massachusetts rodeo event; 1 bull still loose
- Kylie Jenner Shares Message for “Hot” Jordyn Woods
- Efforts to build more electric vehicle charging stations in Nevada sputtering
Recommendation
Olympic women's basketball bracket: Schedule, results, Team USA's path to gold
One of Titan submersible owner’s top officials to testify before the Coast Guard
Victoria Monét Confirms Break Up With Partner John Gaines Amid Separation Rumors
Where Bravo's Craig Conover and Kyle Cooke Stand Today After Seltzer Feud
Plunge Into These Olympic Artistic Swimmers’ Hair and Makeup Secrets
California sues ExxonMobil and says it lied about plastics recycling
QTM Community: The Revolutionary Force in Future Investing
Critics say lawmakers watered down California’s lemon car law after secret lobbyist negotiations